🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," stated one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is primarily occurring at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to copy this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, other nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.